archive-ru.com » RU » I » INTERNETOFTHINGS.RU

Total: 402

Choose link from "Titles, links and description words view":

Or switch to "Titles and links view".
  • IoT Day 2016 - Moscow: Blockchain
    Печать Within the framework of the International Day of Internet of Things we would like to invite everyone to discuss the latest trends Blockchain Complexity Science Cyber Physical Systems Cynefin Framework Speakers 1 Prof Dr Vladimir I Arshinov Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences The science of complexity in new techno social systems Cynefin 2 Prof Dr Vladimir Budanov Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration RANEPA Quantum communication of cyber physical world in the context of NBICS 3 Dr Vadim Chekletso v Executive Director Russian Research Center on the Internet of Things Semantic cultural and anthropological dimensions of blockchain revolution 4 Dr Nikolay Nosov Independent Expert Russian Cloud Computing Professional Association Blockchain and clouds 5 Fedor Antsiferov CEO CommandSpot Standards for IoT networks 6 Mikhail Grankin QIWI Blockchain Developments Perspectives of cryptocurrency 7 Dr George Prokopchuk Techno science Director Russian Research Center on the Internet of Things Smartcontracts 8 Anatoly Levenchuk President TechInvestClub Blockchainization of Artificial Intelligence 9 Dr Timur Shchukin National Technology Initiative NeuroNet Blockchain convergence To participate please send an e mail with your personal data to Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам ботов У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для

    Original URL path: http://internetofthings.ru/internet-of-things-and-russia/185-iot-day-2016-moscow-blockchain-en (2016-05-01)
    Open archived version from archive


  • IoT Day 2016 - Moscow: Blockchain
    Academy of National Economy and Public Administration RANEPA Quantum communication of cyber physical world in the context of NBICS 3 Dr Vadim Chekletso v Executive Director Russian Research Center on the Internet of Things Semantic cultural and anthropological dimensions of blockchain revolution 4 Dr Nikolay Nosov Independent Expert Russian Cloud Computing Professional Association Blockchain and clouds 5 Fedor Antsiferov CEO CommandSpot Standards for IoT networks 6 Mikhail Grankin QIWI Blockchain

    Original URL path: http://internetofthings.ru/internet-of-things-and-russia/185-iot-day-2016-moscow-blockchain-en?tmpl=component&print=1&layout=default&page= (2016-05-01)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Internet of Things (IoT); a new ontology and an engineering challenge
    no doubt with the aim to make me realize how difficult it is to change something even if you know the full truth the path to attain it and where to find proof to show others that the path is there What is the Internet of Things The Internet of Things is the seamless flow between the BAN Body Area Network LAN Home Area Network WAN Wide Area Network and VWAN Very Wide Area Network An enduser will pay for and to whoever links up the data coming from his body ehealth home energy efficiency and ipv6 washing machines washing according to energy management of the street telematics mobility connected car self driving cars electric vehicles and the city as a set of services printing official documents in various locations This is what Google is doing Google Glasses and Smart Contact Lense Google Powermeter and NEST Google Car and Google org sponsoring open data programs in cities In a recent email discussion I had with Vint Cerf on IoT he referred me to an article on Knowbots that he had written with Bob Kahn in 1988 Research will also be undertaken to develop a Knowbot which understands organizational structure and documents associated with it 1 That is a definition of Google itself and it shows that these type of companies will be the new form of organization of society Democracy as we know it everywhere is irrelevant and explaining these shifts to politicians and most civil servants is a waste of time The last Chinese government had out of 11 top politicians 9 engineers That is the same ratio as Google 90 engineers Are these the new engineers of the soul in a literally true sense Then we need a new pact between the writers the liriki and the builders the fiziki In our reality this means we need a new pact between the app builders and the platforms they are building on The Internet of Things has two main roots logistics and the internet The barcode is from 1974 ideas about RFID replacing the barcode stem from 1999 when MIT brings it under the penny cost But in the nineties database storage is still very expensive and the very idea of an Internet of Things is impossible because storing even very temporary hits in xml files is expensive Around 2000 a shift happens as databases storage becomes cheaper and is now so cheap that no startup sees it as a serious cost We can assume that barcodes QR codes Ucodes RFID and Near Field Communication will all remain in an ecology of identifiers more playing a role in the intelligence at the edges like in NFC devices that are not online on the time but make contact with a server every hour or less The Internet was never designed for personal use not for the amount of traffic it is running today Ipv6 and 6Lowpan will be in any device with a little bit of software thus bringing us

    Original URL path: http://internetofthings.ru/internet-of-things-and-russia/92-internet-of-things-iot-a-new-ontology-and-an-engineering-challenge (2016-05-01)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Internet of Things (IoT); a new ontology and an engineering challenge
    Stalker from Tarkovsky no doubt with the aim to make me realize how difficult it is to change something even if you know the full truth the path to attain it and where to find proof to show others that the path is there What is the Internet of Things The Internet of Things is the seamless flow between the BAN Body Area Network LAN Home Area Network WAN Wide Area Network and VWAN Very Wide Area Network An enduser will pay for and to whoever links up the data coming from his body ehealth home energy efficiency and ipv6 washing machines washing according to energy management of the street telematics mobility connected car self driving cars electric vehicles and the city as a set of services printing official documents in various locations This is what Google is doing Google Glasses and Smart Contact Lense Google Powermeter and NEST Google Car and Google org sponsoring open data programs in cities In a recent email discussion I had with Vint Cerf on IoT he referred me to an article on Knowbots that he had written with Bob Kahn in 1988 Research will also be undertaken to develop a Knowbot which understands organizational structure and documents associated with it 1 That is a definition of Google itself and it shows that these type of companies will be the new form of organization of society Democracy as we know it everywhere is irrelevant and explaining these shifts to politicians and most civil servants is a waste of time The last Chinese government had out of 11 top politicians 9 engineers That is the same ratio as Google 90 engineers Are these the new engineers of the soul in a literally true sense Then we need a new pact between the writers the liriki and the builders the fiziki In our reality this means we need a new pact between the app builders and the platforms they are building on The Internet of Things has two main roots logistics and the internet The barcode is from 1974 ideas about RFID replacing the barcode stem from 1999 when MIT brings it under the penny cost But in the nineties database storage is still very expensive and the very idea of an Internet of Things is impossible because storing even very temporary hits in xml files is expensive Around 2000 a shift happens as databases storage becomes cheaper and is now so cheap that no startup sees it as a serious cost We can assume that barcodes QR codes Ucodes RFID and Near Field Communication will all remain in an ecology of identifiers more playing a role in the intelligence at the edges like in NFC devices that are not online on the time but make contact with a server every hour or less The Internet was never designed for personal use not for the amount of traffic it is running today Ipv6 and 6Lowpan will be in any device with a little bit of software

    Original URL path: http://internetofthings.ru/internet-of-things-and-russia/92-internet-of-things-iot-a-new-ontology-and-an-engineering-challenge?tmpl=component&print=1&layout=default&page= (2016-05-01)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Internet of Things: Ontological and Anthropological Perspective
    suggested understanding cognitive phenomena in terms of the relations between stimuli and responses in the external environment That is in terms of external representations only with the mind brain considered as a blackbox B B Cognitivism Fig 1 suggests the exact opposite cognitive phenomena must be understood in terms of internal processes and representations treating stimulus response relations as means to reveal processes inside the mind brain In both the mind brain with its internal representations and the environment with its external representations are perceived as two essentially independent and causally related entities SIRN suggests perceiving the boundaries of the cognitive system that is to treat the behaviorist and cognitivist perceptions as two aspects of a single integrated inter representational network Fig 3 Note that unlike behaviorism that considered bodily external representations only the SIRN system proposed here includes also artifactual representations The suggestion to include artifacts within the boundaries of the cognitive goes back to Vygotsky According to him signs tools activities or artifacts as Cole prefers to call them are all integral elements of the cognitive system by virtue of their role as mediators in higher psychological processes We add to Portugali Inter representation scheme Fig 3 following elements Fig 4 1 WEB Classic Internet with person s re presentations blogs social nets It s interesting that modern WEB consist of re presentations not only living people We can speak about WEB like as Human Culture representation 2 WEB OF THINGS Internet of things with RFID technology is an active communicative field where person s re presentations actualize through the Classic Internet 3 OTHER with a pattern of Inter representation with YOU and SELF remember K Pribram Holographic Brain So our Inter representation network is synergetic SIRN with OTHER and Internet of Things our Smart Environment Fig 4

    Original URL path: http://internetofthings.ru/internet-of-things-and-russia/6-internet-of-things-ontological-and-anthropological-perspective (2016-05-01)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Internet of Things: Ontological and Anthropological Perspective
    cognitivism historical controversy Behaviorism Fig 2 suggested understanding cognitive phenomena in terms of the relations between stimuli and responses in the external environment That is in terms of external representations only with the mind brain considered as a blackbox B B Cognitivism Fig 1 suggests the exact opposite cognitive phenomena must be understood in terms of internal processes and representations treating stimulus response relations as means to reveal processes inside the mind brain In both the mind brain with its internal representations and the environment with its external representations are perceived as two essentially independent and causally related entities SIRN suggests perceiving the boundaries of the cognitive system that is to treat the behaviorist and cognitivist perceptions as two aspects of a single integrated inter representational network Fig 3 Note that unlike behaviorism that considered bodily external representations only the SIRN system proposed here includes also artifactual representations The suggestion to include artifacts within the boundaries of the cognitive goes back to Vygotsky According to him signs tools activities or artifacts as Cole prefers to call them are all integral elements of the cognitive system by virtue of their role as mediators in higher psychological processes We add to Portugali Inter representation scheme Fig 3 following elements Fig 4 1 WEB Classic Internet with person s re presentations blogs social nets It s interesting that modern WEB consist of re presentations not only living people We can speak about WEB like as Human Culture representation 2 WEB OF THINGS Internet of things with RFID technology is an active communicative field where person s re presentations actualize through the Classic Internet 3 OTHER with a pattern of Inter representation with YOU and SELF remember K Pribram Holographic Brain So our Inter representation network is synergetic SIRN with OTHER and Internet of

    Original URL path: http://internetofthings.ru/internet-of-things-and-russia/6-internet-of-things-ontological-and-anthropological-perspective?tmpl=component&print=1&layout=default&page= (2016-05-01)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Internet of Things Concept for a Social Responsibility
    a vast subject it must be broken down in different layers a value chain a service an application layer the smart city concept and a global layer The first layer affects industry and end users the second affects individuals and business models the third affects planning and infrastructure the fourth affects how decision making processes and resources will be divided on the planet When objects can both sense the environment and communicate they become tools for understanding complexity and responding to it swiftly What s revolutionary in all this is that these physical information systems are now beginning to be deployed and some of them even work largely without human intervention Chui 2010 Internet of Things IoT could be defined as a dynamic global network infrastructure with self configuring capabilities based on standard and interoperable communication protocols where physical and virtual things have identities physical attributes and virtual personalities and use intelligent interfaces and are seamlessly integrated into the information network Sundmaeker 2010 The social responsibility level depends on very complex interconnections and inter representations Portugali 2002 of material energy psychological intersubjective and other dimensions of our hybrid Actor Network Latour 2005 Environments Some crucial elements of such a system can be improved in Social Responsibility context by IoT tools and other instruments of hybrid reality and pan communication technologies For example Increase of persons and groups awareness through transparency of online information relating to our lifeworld accessibility of neibourghood sensor networks data streams visualization of concrete individual actions system effects Modus operandi changing by thematic serious games including pervasive Montola 2007 city games on real landscapes with RFID AR Sensors Self Tracking etc usage How to implement our new abilities to distant perception interaction communication with artifacts and other persons by web of things wireless body area networks WBAN

    Original URL path: http://internetofthings.ru/internet-of-things-and-russia/7-internet-of-things-concept-for-a-social-responsibility?tmpl=component&print=1&layout=default&page= (2016-05-01)
    Open archived version from archive

  • Internet of Things Concept for a Social Responsibility
    subject it must be broken down in different layers a value chain a service an application layer the smart city concept and a global layer The first layer affects industry and end users the second affects individuals and business models the third affects planning and infrastructure the fourth affects how decision making processes and resources will be divided on the planet When objects can both sense the environment and communicate they become tools for understanding complexity and responding to it swiftly What s revolutionary in all this is that these physical information systems are now beginning to be deployed and some of them even work largely without human intervention Chui 2010 Internet of Things IoT could be defined as a dynamic global network infrastructure with self configuring capabilities based on standard and interoperable communication protocols where physical and virtual things have identities physical attributes and virtual personalities and use intelligent interfaces and are seamlessly integrated into the information network Sundmaeker 2010 The social responsibility level depends on very complex interconnections and inter representations Portugali 2002 of material energy psychological intersubjective and other dimensions of our hybrid Actor Network Latour 2005 Environments Some crucial elements of such a system can be improved in Social Responsibility context by IoT tools and other instruments of hybrid reality and pan communication technologies For example Increase of persons and groups awareness through transparency of online information relating to our lifeworld accessibility of neibourghood sensor networks data streams visualization of concrete individual actions system effects Modus operandi changing by thematic serious games including pervasive Montola 2007 city games on real landscapes with RFID AR Sensors Self Tracking etc usage How to implement our new abilities to distant perception interaction communication with artifacts and other persons by web of things wireless body area networks WBAN etc How

    Original URL path: http://internetofthings.ru/internet-of-things-and-russia/7-internet-of-things-concept-for-a-social-responsibility (2016-05-01)
    Open archived version from archive